One comment on “Webcams in the Classroom at MCMS

  1. Hi Lisa,

    In my home Canadian province of Alberta, our government has implemented a high-speed network which connects all schools, hospitals, libraries, and government institutions. With this has also come a large implementation of videoconferencing hardware, and we now have over 800 school sites in our province who connect to thousands of others for class-to-class collaborations, content experts, full course delivery, and special events (e.g. VC for Hope, a social awareness and fundraising project to build a school in Nicaragua – in case you want to see video clips or more information).

    While the equipment involved to do IP videoconferencing is more expensive than a webcam and Skype solution is, to me the investment is a very valuable one. Videoconferencing hardware has high quality cameras which can pan and zoom, and the audio quality from the microphones is outstanding. What results – and this is the key – is a transparent technology experience with kids being able to see each other clearly and up close, being able to quickly pan to different people, and just as importantly having the audio quality necessary for seamless communication. Though Skype is a good solution for a person-to-person realtime audio/video experience, to me it’s not nearly adequate for a full classroom experience.

    I used to be in the camp of webcam videoconferencing for the cost savings, but after being immersed myself in hardware-based IP videoconferencing for the past two years I’d never go back to webcams. Just my opinion 🙂

    Keep up the great posts!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s